
Andrews discussess how much of the results and sales are coming from auction prices, and how it is easier to compile price indexs, but the downside being the quality and authenticity of the property may be in question and therfore the prices not as realistic. A problem appraiser typically have to deal with when finding and using comparable property. It might look the same, but how much "work" has been done on the item, or has it been cataloged improperly?
Andrew's states The Index's constituent pieces, although still not top of the scale, are starting to look increasingly like those now collected by the rich rather than the middle of the 'food chain' once prevailing, where we were all comfortable. By far the largest number of antique furniture trans-actions takes place at auction, nowadays with a significant retail element. It is twenty years since Christopher Weston of the auctioneers Phillips claimed 'We are the retailers now' even though the trade still constitutes a major element in their business. It is correct for the Index to reflect this weight of information in addition to the others. The relatively recent availability of millions of auction prices on the Internet is undoubtedly an additional blessing to our collations, but the raw data available needs to be viewed with caution. Very often the initial impression given on tapping into Internet auction price records is that of a huge catalogue of low-priced or unsold items with jaw-dropping bargains flowing through the rooms, indicating a massive drop in antique furniture prices.
To read the excerpt of the Andrews article click HERE.
No comments:
Post a Comment