Fellow appraiser Susan Tarman, ISA AM sent me an interesting are appraiser relevant article from artnet news on a lawsuit on damage to a Brancusi sculpture, with an appraised value of $22.5 million before damage and $16.9 million after the repair.
Part of the issue is who is responsible for the damage, as the collector consigned the work to Artemus, but set up the sculpture on the pedestal. Right now the suit is about who is responsible for the damage, and it does not list who appraised, weather the $22.5 million was a stated value on the insurance policy, or if there are other appraisals on the pre damage sculpture and the diminution of value. This will be an interesting suit to follow.
artnet news reports
Source: artnet newsA French collector is suing Asher Edelman, who runs the art-financing company Artemus, and two insurances companies for allegedly damaging a prized Constantin Brancusi sculpture.
In a complaint filed earlier this week in New York State Supreme Court, Marc Baradel alleged that after he consigned the sculpture, Brancusi’s Le Poisson (ca. 1920–22), to Artemus it fell from a pedestal and broke in half. According to an appraisal report filed in court, the work was valued at $22.5 million prior to the accident; after the fall and repair it was reappraised at $16.9 million.
Edelman, has denied the accusations, claiming that Baradel himself set the sculpture on a pedestal in the Artemus office before it fell off minutes later. “It’s preposterous,” Edelman told artnet News. “Marc Baradel mounted the Brancusi on a pedestal in my office. He went and sat down on the couch and it immediately fell. By then he had had a certificate of insurance in hand.”
A consignment agreement attached to the complaint shows that Baradel insured the work for up to $5 million through two insurance companies, the Chicago-based HUB International and Lloyd’s of London, but says that neither honored the agreement after the work was damaged.
Brancusi, Le Poisson (ca. 1920-22) after the fall.
According to the complaint, Artemus “breached the consignment agreement by not protecting the Art from damage during their stewardship.” It goes on to say that “HUB and Lloyd’s have withheld payment by engaging in conduct that may be characterized as ‘gross’ and ‘morally reprehensible,’ and of such wanton dishonesty as to imply a criminal indifference to civil obligations by not payment the claim.”
Baradel is seeking $22.5 million from Edelman and Artemus and an additional $5 million in damages from HUB and Lloyd’s.
Baradel’s attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment, nor did representatives from Lloyd’s of London. HUB International declined to comment.
 |
No comments:
Post a Comment