The NY Times reports
To read the full NYT article, click HERE.A preliminary police investigation ensued; on Dec. 13 the case went to the next step when a magistrate in the area opened a judicial investigation to explore the possibility of “possession of stolen goods.” (No criminal charges have been filed.)
Meanwhile, in an apparent coincidence, an auction of the estate of the widow of Picasso’s onetime driver, which was to have included 80 other works by the artist, was postponed this month as a result of the accusations. Mr. Le Guennec is a cousin of the widow and is one of her heirs, and the other inheritors felt that the suspicions hanging over him might mar the sale.
“L’Affaire Picasso,” as the press calls it, began in September, when Mr. Le Guennec and his wife, Danielle, 68, packed their art into a modest suitcase and traveled north to Paris to have it authenticated by Claude Ruiz-Picasso, the artist’s son and the administrator of the Picasso estate. Mr. Ruiz-Picasso, recognizing the authenticity of the works, immediately suspected theft and contacted a lawyer, who soon brought the suit that opened the initial investigation.
Reached by telephone, Ms. Le Guennec declined to speak to a reporter or put her husband on the phone. Evelyne Rees, a lawyer for the couple, said they were exhausted after weeks of incessant interview requests.
“These poor people, they’re distraught, crushed that they’re being accused of being thieves,” she said.
Mr. Le Guennec says the art was given to him one evening in 1971 by Picasso’s second wife, Jacqueline, on behalf of the artist, who was then 89 or 90. The Le Guennecs, who say they live off a monthly pension of less than $1,500, claim the works sat untouched in a box in their garage for nearly 40 years; they say they never realized the cache’s value.
No comments:
Post a Comment