8/23/2018

ASB Reelases Second USPAP 2020-2012 Exposure Draft



The ASB has just released the second exposure draft for the 2020-2021 edition of USPAP.

To download the second exposure draft, CLICK HERE.

The ASB reports
The Appraisal Standards Board has issued a Second Exposure Draft of proposed changes for the 2020-21 edition of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) on the following topics:
  • STANDARDS
  • SCOPE OF WORK RULE
  • COMPETENCY RULE
  • DEFINITIONS

Other edits to improve clarity and enforceability of USPAP
The proposed changes to the Advisory Opinions will be exposed soon.

The written comment deadline is October 10, 2018. To submit comments on the proposals, please email ASBcomments@appraisalfoundation.org.
The Executive summary states
Executive Summary
Second Exposure Draft of Proposed Changes for the 20
20-21 USPAP

This  Executive  Summary  is  intended  to  be  a  brief  discussion  of  each  section  in  the  document.  Because some readers may not have an interest in every section of the document, the Executive Summary gives an overview to help readers find the sections related to their specific interest(s). For  detailed  information  on  proposed  revisions  and  the  reasons  for  the  proposals,  the  ASB encourages  readers  to  review  the  rationale  as  well  as  the  specific  changes  being  proposed.  As always, the ASB requests readers to submit any relevant comments.

Section 1 – STANDARDS (Reporting Options and Comments
 in Standards Rules)

Reporting Options

The ASB is proposing significant revisions to STANDARDS 2, 8, and 10.  Rather than limiting appraisal reports to either a one-size-fits-all or the current two-sizes-fits-all reporting options, the ASB is proposing a model that reduces the specificity without diminishing the USPAP reporting requirements. The Board is also proposing the elimination of report labels and specific warning language, electing instead to propose a simpler but more comprehensive requirement:  “If there are  use  restrictions  or  other  limitations,  the  appraiser  must  state  them  accurately,  clearly, and conspicuously.”  The  ASB  is  proposing  some  parallel  changes  to  STANDARDS  4  and  6  as
appropriate for consistency.
Comments in Standards Rules

In the First Exposure Draft the ASB proposed several actions related to Comments
 in the Standards Rules  and  demonstrated  a  model  of  this  proposal  for  STANDARD  1.    These  actions  included deleting  some Comments that had duplicate  requirements   clearly   stated   elsewhere   and   incorporating others directly into the Standards Rules. The response to the First Exposure Draft indicated these actions were helpful in increasing the clarity of USPAP. For the Second Exposure Draft  all  of  the  STANDARDS  include  revisions  to  the  Comments  Some have  been  reworded, deleted, moved, or incorporated into the Standards Rules
.
Section 2 – SCOPE OF WORK RULE

In the First Exposure Draft, the ASB proposed changes to the SCOPE OF WORK RULE which would remove references to disclosure obligations under this RULE. After considering responses to this proposal, the ASB is now proposing to add language to the Disclosure Obligations section of the SCOPE OF WORK RULE to clarify the nature, form and format of disclosure.

Section 3 – COMPETENCY RULE

The ASB proposes to move the following important Comment out of Standards Rules 1-1, 3-1, 5-  1, 7-1, and 9-1 and place it into the COMPETENCY RULE:
 “Perfection is impossible to attain, and competence does not require perfection. However, an appraiser must not render appraisal services in a careless or negligent manner. ThisStandards Rule requires an appraiser to use due diligence and due care.”This particular Comment currently appears only in the development Standards Rules, but it has been pointed out that it should also apply to reporting. The proposal in this Second Exposure Draft inserts an edited version of the Comment into the COMPETENCY RULE. This move reduces duplication and, at the same time, broadens the applicability of this important Comment since the COMPETENCY RULE applies to both development and reporting in all disciplines.

Section 4 – DEFINITIONS
Based upon responses received from the First Exposure Draft, the ASB is proposing some modifications and additions to the DEFINITIONS in order to help readers better understand USPAP. Both exposure drafts propose to include USPAP terms that differ from or are not found in popular English dictionaries and also, in a few instances, to indicate which popular dictionary definition is meant to be used if there are multiple definitions.

Section 5 – Other Edits to Improve Clarity and Enforceability of USPAP
The Board  is  proposing  several  edits  for  clarity  and  consistency.    The  edits  are  related  to  the following three terms or phrases:
1.Accept an assignment
2. At the time of the assignment
3.Intangible Items
Note that the Part II of the Second Exposure Draft – Proposed Changes to the Advisory Opinions, will follow shortly.




No comments: